Artificial intelligence as the pentagon’s latest weapon – times of india

Carter made his fourth trip to the tech industry’s heartland since being named to his post last year. Developing artificial intelligence Before that, it had been 20 years since a defense secretary had visited the area, he noted in a speech at a Defense Department research facility near Google’s headquarters.

companies specializing in that technology – has grown out of the “Third Offset” strategy articulated by Carter last fall.

Artificial intelligence and society Concerned about the re-emergence of China and Russia as military competitors, he stated that computer-based, high-tech weapons would give the US military an edge in the future.

Third Offset is a reference to two earlier eras when Pentagon planners turned to technology to compensate for a smaller military. A 1 artificial intelligence In the 1950s, President Dwight Eisenhower emphasized nuclear weapons as a deterrence to larger Warsaw Pact armies. Artificial intelligence expert systems A second “offset” occurred in the 1970s and ’80s when military planners turned to improved technology in conventional weapons to again compensate for smaller numbers.

This time, Carter acknowledged, the United States faces significant challenges in translating civilian innovation into a military advantage, since the country will neither control nor determine the path of artificial intelligence.

“That’s different than 30 or 40 or 50 years ago when we expected to control the pace of technology,” he said Wednesday in a speech at the Pentagon’s nearly 1-year-old Defense Innovation Unit Experimental facility, otherwise known by the techie acronym DIUx. Artificial intelligence synonyms “That’s not true anymore, but we still can stay the best military with respect to applications of AI”

In recent weeks, Deputy Defense Secretary Robert O Work has repeatedly emphasized the importance of AI-related technologies that he believes will help create a new class of “

He has invoked the concept of “Centaur Warfighting” – systems that combine AI with the capabilities of humans, resulting in faster responses than humans alone could achieve.

The Defense Department will need Silicon Valley’s help with that technology. Artificial intelligence software testing And Carter indicated that bridge-building with local companies was a key reason the new Pentagon office he visited Wednesday will now report directly to him.

Many companies still count the Pentagon and intelligence agencies among their biggest customers. Projects in artificial intelligence A venture fund backed by the CIA has been investing in tech companies since the dot-com boom of the late 1990s.

The depiction of defense weapons that fire without a human operator raised alarms among arms control advocates and some military strategists who worry that the line between offensive and defensive uses of smart weapons will be difficult to maintain.

“We need to figure out where to draw the line and we need to stay on the right side of it,” said Stuart J Russell, an AI specialist at the University of California, Berkeley who is a leader in a movement to ban autonomous weapons.

In fact, turning over killing decisions to machines is seen by some technologists and military strategists as inviting a new and possibly destabilizing arms race.

“I’m not as confident that we can clearly delineate between offensive and defensive weapons, in general,” said Paul Scharre, a weapons analyst at the Center for a New American Security, a Washington-based policy group. Artificial intelligence and computer science “If there was an easy way to do that, nations would have agreed long ago to only build ‘defensive’ weapons.”

Despite skepticism among some in the tech community, the Pentagon has played a key role in one of the best-known examples of AI, the self-driving vehicle concepts now championed by companies like

Beginning in 2004, DARPA, the Pentagon’s advanced research agency, tried to speed progress in autonomous vehicles by hosting a series of three autonomous vehicle “Grand Challenges.” The effort set off a wave of commercial research and development, but it fell short of a goal to remove U.S. Artificial intelligence publications soldiers from hazardous roles on the battlefield.

Military contractors say that self-driving technology has now advanced to the point where a human soldier could sit in the driver’s seat in the last vehicle in a truck convoy, safely controlling a series of vehicles. Artificial intelligence how close are we Despite technology demonstrations, however, the U.S. Artificial intelligence journal papers military has not yet committed to converting existing trucks to such a system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *